Stomach: equine squamous gastric disease
Synonym(s): ESGD
Introduction
- Cause: ESGD refers specifically to peptic injury of the squamous mucosa of the stomach. Intensive management and exercise are important factors that contribute to a disruption of the normal stratification of gastric pH. This results in exposure of the vulnerable squamous mucosa to acid, leading to ulceration.
- Signs: clinical signs are variable and there is little evidence to support a direct association between reported signs and the presence or absence of lesions seen on gastroscopy.
- Diagnosis: visualization of gastric squamous disease on gastroscopy.
- Treatment: acid suppression using oral (or injectable) omeprazole and mitigation of known risk factors through management changes.
- Prognosis: good; healing rates for oral omeprazole monotherapy range from 67–100%.
Presenting signs
- Clinical signs are variable and there is little evidence to support a direct association between reported signs and the presence or absence of lesions seen on gastroscopy.
- Clinical signs that have been attributed to ESGD in adult horses include inappetence, poor body condition or weight loss, changes in behavior, acute or recurrent colic, bruxism, and stereotypic behavior (crib biting, stall weaving) and poor performance.
- Foals will often be asymptomatic. When clinical signs do occur, they tend to manifest as poor body condition, inappetence, ptyalism Mouth: ptyalism, bruxism Behavior: bruxism or colic Abdomen: pain - adult.
Geographic incidence
- Worldwide.
Age predisposition
- All ages from neonates to adults.
Gender predisposition
- Many studies finding geldings to be at higher risk than mares, meanwhile others finding no effect of gender.
Breed/Species predisposition
- The Thoroughbred Thoroughbred Thoroughbred and Standardbred Standardbred breeds are associated with an increased risk of ESGD, although whether these are true breed predilections or simply reflective of exposure to management risk factors is unclear.
- Prevalence for ESGD vary by group sampled and exercise program. A prevalence of 37–52%, 38–56% and 48% in Thoroughbred, Standardbred and endurance racehorses, respectively, while out of training have been reported. These increase up to 100%, 72–88% and 57–93%, respectively, when these same populations are in training.
- The prevalence varies greatly in other populations of horses, including 11% in university teaching horses, 55–68% of adult horses at Thoroughbred stud-farms, 79% in Western pleasure horses and 51% in Italian donkeys.
- More recently, the prevalence of ESGD at post-mortem has been described as 61% in feral horses in the UK and 64% of equids in a safari park.
Cost considerations
- Cost of treatment.
- Days of training lost whilst recovering may have a financial impact.
Pathogenesis
Etiology
- Equine squamous gastric disease is a consequence of sustained exposure of the squamous mucosa to acid.
Predisposing factors
General
- ESGD can be either primary or secondary.
- Primary ESGD occurs in response to risk factors inherent in domestication and intensive management that result in prolonged exposure of the squamous mucosa to acid in horses with an otherwise normal gastrointestinal tract.
- Secondary ESGD occurs as a direct consequence of delayed gastric emptying. This causes chronic gastric distension resulting in prolonged exposure of the squamous mucosa to acid. The most common cause of delayed gastric emptying in adult horses and foals is pyloric outflow obstruction secondary to glandular gastric disease.
Specific
- The prevalence is highest in performance horses and reflects changes in management and intensity of exercise inherent in competition. It has been shown that the risk of ESGD increases with an increase in the intensity of exercise and the duration of time at work. This association is well recognized in Thoroughbred and Standardbred racehorses, but has also been shown in elite endurance horses, show jumping warmbloods and other non-racing performance horses.
- Strenuous exercise causes an increase in intra-abdominal pressure associated with contraction of the abdominal muscles. This results in gastric compression and exposure of the sensitive squamous mucosa to acidic gastric content. Strenuous exercise has also been shown to cause an increase in post-prandial gastrin secretion, resulting in an increased production of HCl.
- Several additional factors associated with management have also been shown to increase the risk of ESGD, many of which are imposed on horses at the commencement of training or during active competition. These include the trainer, high starch/low roughage diets, fasting, stall confinement, transport, intermittent access to water and administration of hypertonic solutions of electrolytes.
- Exposure to a combination of a high starch diet, stall confinement and strenuous exercise has been shown to induce lesions in as little as 7 days Nutrition: adult Nutrition: work.
- Intermittent fasting is so effective at inducing lesions that it is used as a model for ESGD in experimental studies. Intermittent fasting disrupts normal pH stratification of gastric content, thereby allowing high concentrations of HCl and refluxed bile to mix in the dorsal stomach.
- Low roughage diets also disrupt normal pH stratification by causing greater gastric fluidity and mixing of dorsal and ventral gastric contents, but in addition to this, horses chew less, and this results in decreased production of saliva, which is an important buffer of acid in the dorsal stomach.
- Ingestion of large quantities of fermentable carbohydrate (starch >1 g/kg/meal) exacerbates the situation further by causing rapid production of SCFA, which acts synergistically with HCl in the presence of a low pH to cause acid injury of the squamous epithelium. High concentrate diets also stimulate secretion of gastrin which results in further acid secretion.
- Feeding of straw has been associated with an increased risk of ESGD, presumably due to the abrasive effect of the coarse roughage, and this may be relevant to other forage with a high lignin content.
- Horses that had access to some pasture turnout were less likely to have ESGD, with horses turned out with other horses having a further decreased risk, in one study. Conversely, pasture turnout was not found to be protective against ESGD in other populations in other studies.
- Non-performance horses are also susceptible to ESGD, but the prevalence is generally lower, and when lesions occur, they tend to be less severe. This suggests that risk factors other than intense exercise and management may play a role and underscores the multifactorial nature of this disease.
- There is conflicting evidence for the role that intrinsic risk factors, such as age, gender, and breed, may play a role in the development of ESGD and where evidence exists, it is likely to be confounded by other factors such as management and exercise.
- Crib-biting Behavior: crib-biting and wind-sucking is associated with an increased risk of ESGD, as are other stereotypies.
- There is no conclusive evidence to suggest that stress and administration of inappropriate doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an increased risk of ESGD.
- Interestingly, ESGD has also been reported in wild equids and feral horses with no apparent exposure to recognized risk factors, and it poses an interesting (and as yet unanswered) question as to whether some degree of ESGD is “constitutive” in the equine stomach and develops as a normal response to periodic exposure of the squamous mucosa to acid. This notion is supported by the fact that many horses with ESGD will not demonstrate clinical signs and the fact that mild lesions may heal spontaneously, particularly if the inciting cause has been removed.
- In foals, the prevalence of ESGD ranges from 7% to 57% depending upon the age. Older weanling foals appear to be most susceptible, however ESGD has also been reported in foals as young as 24 h. Very few risk factors have been reported for ESGD in foals. Concomitant gastrointestinal disease has been associated with the presence of ESGD at the time of necropsy, however a cause-and-effect relationship has not been demonstrated.
Pathophysiology
- The squamous mucosa of the equine stomach is inherently vulnerable to acid injury as it has a poor blood supply and does not possess a mucus-bicarbonate layer to protect itself. The thick keratinized epithelium together with the presence of high electrical resistance, tight epithelial junctions and an osmophilic phospholipid surfactant-like layer provide some protection, however this mucosal barrier is rapidly overwhelmed in the presence of acid.
- Acid injury is primarily attributable to endogenous hydrochloric acid (HCl), which erodes the outer keratinized layers of the squamous epithelium and results in disruption of the bioelectric properties of the transporting cells, thus compromising barrier function. In addition, other gastric constituents, including short chain fatty acids (SCFA), lactic acid and bile salts, have been shown to act synergistically with HCl, thus further attenuating barrier function and ultimately resulting in cellular injury.
- The sequence of events following exposure of squamous epithelial cells to acid is the movement of H+ ions across the cell membrane, acidification of cellular contents, inhibition of sodium transport, cellular swelling and ultimately cell death. The squamous epithelium initially reacts by thickening and becoming hyperkeratotic. Sloughing of superficial layers of epithelium result in the development of erosions, and with continued acid exposure, lesions deepen to form ulcers.
Timecourse
- Variable time from onset of clinical signs to presentation due to non-specific nature of these signs.
Diagnosis
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Treatment
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Prevention
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Outcomes
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Further Reading
Publications
Refereed papers
- Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
- Busechian S, Sgorbini M, Orvieto S et al (2021) Evaluation of a questionnaire to detect the risk of developing ESGD or EGGD in horses. Prev Vet Med 188, 105-285 PubMed.
- Galinelli N, Wambacq W, Broeckx B J G & Hesta M (2021) High intake of sugars and starch, low number of meals and low roughage intake are associated with Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in a Belgian cohort. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 105 (Suppl 2), 18-23 PubMed.
- Sykes B W, Bowen M, Habershon-Butcher J L et al (2019) Management factors and clinical implications of glandular and squamous gastric disease in horses. J Vet Intern Med 33 (1), 233-240 PubMed.
- Hewetson M, Venner M, Volquardsen J et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of blood sucrose as a screening test for equine gastric ulcer syndrome (EGUS) in weanling foals. Acta Vet Scand 60 (1), 24 PubMed.
- Pedersen S K, Cribb A E, Windeyer M C et al (2018) Risk factors for equine glandular and squamous gastric disease in show jumping Warmbloods. Equine Vet J 50 (6), 747-751 PubMed.
- Sykes B W, Hewetson M, Hepburn R J et al (2015) European College of Equine Internal Medicine consensus statement–equine gastric ulcer syndrome in adult horses. J Vet Intern Med 29 (5), 1288-1299 PubMed.
- Ward S, Sykes B W, Brown H et al (2015) A comparison of the prevalence of gastric ulceration in feral and domesticated horses in the UK. Equine Vet Educ 12 (12), 655-657 ResearchGate.
- Luthersson N et al (2009) The prevalence and anatomical distribution of equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Vet J 41 (7), 619-624 PubMed.
- Tamzali Y, Marguet C, Priymenko N & Lyazrhi F (2011) Prevalence of gastric ulcer syndrome in high-level endurance horses. Equine Vet J 43 (2), 141-144 PubMed.
- Luthersson N et al (2009) Risk factors associated with equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Vet J 41 (7), 625-630 PubMed.
- Bell R, Kingston J, Mogg T & Perkins N (2007) The prevalence of gastric ulceration in racehorses in New Zealand. New Zeal Vet J 55 (1), 13-18 PubMed.
- Jonsson H & Egenvall A (2006) Prevalence of gastric ulceration in Swedish Standardbreds in race training. Equine Vet J 38 (3), 209-213 PubMed.
- Roy M A, Vrins A, Beauchamp G & Doucet M Y (2005) Prevalence of ulcers of the squamous gastric mucosa in standardbred horses. J Vet Intern Med 19 (5), 744-750 PubMed.
- Begg L M & O’Sullivan C B (2003) The prevalence and distribution of gastric ulceration in 345 racehorses. Aust Vet J 81 (4), 199-201 PubMed.
- Dionne R M, Vrins A, Doucet M Y & Pare J (2003) Gastric ulcers in standardbred racehorses: prevalence, lesion description, and risk factors. J Vet Intern Med 17 (2), 218-222 PubMed.
- Hartmann A M & Frankeny R L (2003) A preliminary investigation into the association between competition and gastric ulcer formation in non-racing performance horses. J Equine Vet Sci 23 (12), 560-561 ResearchGate.
- Murray M J, Grodinsky C, Anderson C W et al (1989) Gastric ulcers in horses: a comparison of endoscopic findings in horses with and without clinical signs. Equine Vet J Suppl 7, 68-72 PubMed.