Proximal sesamoid: fracture repair - wire in Horses (Equis) | Vetlexicon
equis - Articles

Proximal sesamoid: fracture repair – wire

ISSN 2398-2977

Contributor(s) :


Introduction

  • Midbody fractures of the proximal sesamoid bones Proximal sesamoid: fracture require internal fixation to achieve a bony union and to restore the function of the suspensory apparatus and fetlock joint.
  • Constant tension on the fracture line by the suspensory apparatus → instability with poor healing, often fibrous union and chronic pain in midbody fractures unless internal fixation is used.
  • Initially a circumferential transfixation wiring technique was reported but this was found to be associated with high postoperative morbidity and complications of wire slippage and breakage. Subsequently, a hemicircumferential wiring technique was published and this is the technique reported here. Initially this was via an open technique but recently an endoscopic guided technique has been published.

Approaches

  • Arthroscopic: via the palmar/plantar pouch of the fetlock joint and the proximal digital flexor tendon sheath Fetlock: arthroscopy.
  • Arthrotomy: of the palmar/plantar fetlock joint and synoviotomy of the digital flexor tendon sheath via desmotomy of the palmar/plantar annular ligament.

Uses

Advantages

  • Improves fracture stability → bony union and restoration of suspensory apparatus function.
  • Requires no special equipment.
  • Technically less demanding than lag screw fixation Proximal sesamoid bone: fracture repair – lag screw but requires good anatomical knowledge.

Disadvantages

  • Can be difficult to achieve good apposition and stable reduction.
  • Less stable than lag screw technique Proximal sesamoid bone: fracture repair – lag screw leading to fracture distraction, gap formation and consequently worse prognosis for successful repair.
  • Requires longer period of cast immobilization than lag screw fixation.
  • Possible irritation of the tendon sheath, wire migration and impingement on adjacent soft tissues.

Alternative techniques

Time required

Preparation

  • General anesthesia induction and maintenance: 20 min.
  • Aseptic preparation: 10 min.

Procedure

Decision taking

Criteria for choosing test/procedure

Requirements

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Preparation

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Procedure

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Aftercare

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Outcomes

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Further Reading

Publications

Refereed papers

  • Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
  • Busschers E, Richardson D W, Hogan P M et al (2008) Surgical repair of mid-body proximal sesamoid bone fractures in 25 horses. Vet Surg 37 (8), 771-780 PubMed.
  • Rothaug P G, Boston R C, Richardson D W et al (2002) A comparison of ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene cable and stainless steel wire using two fixation techniques for repair of equine midbody sesamoid fractures: an in vitro biomechanical study. Vet Surg 31 (5), 445-454 PubMed.
  • Woodie J B, Ruggles A J & Litsky A S (2000) In vitro biomechanical properties of 2 compression fixation methods for midbody proximal sesamoid bone fractures in horses. Vet Surg 29 (4), 358-363 PubMed.
  • Martin B B, Nunamaker D M, Evans L H et al (1991) Circumferential wiring of mid-body and large basilar fractures of the proximal sesamoid bone in 15 horses. Vet Surg 20, 9-14 PubMed.

Other sources of information

  • Wright I M (2020) Fractures of the Proximal Sesamoid Bones. In: Equine Fracture Repair. Ed: Nixon A J. Wiley Blackwell, USA. ISBN 9780813815862.