equis - Articles
Testis: cryptorchidectomy – ventral midline approach
Introduction
- Unilateral cryptorchids can be used for breeding but as the condition is hereditary this should be actively discouraged and castration of both testicles recommended Testis: cryptorchidism.
- Bilateral cases should be castrated as hormonal and surgical treatments to effect descent are unethical and often unsuccessful.
- Abdominally retained testes may have an increased incidence of neoplasia Testis: neoplasia - overview.
Uses
- Castration of unilateral/bilateral cryptorchids Testis: cryptorchidism.
Advantages
- Both abdominal testicles can be removed.
- Secure closure of incision.
- Maximum exploration of abdomen is possible - allows access to testes at remote and unusual sites within the abdomen.
Disadvantages
- Allows removal of abdominal testicles only - not suitable for removal of inguinally retained testes.
- Considered more invasive than inguinal/parainguinal and may → increased post-operative complications.
Alternative techniques
- Laparoscopic removal of testicles in anesthetized or standing horses Abdomen: laparoscopy.
- 5 different non-laparascopic approaches:
- Ventral midline (described here).
- Inguinal Testis: cryptorchidectomy - inguinal / parainguinal.
- Parainguinal Testis: cryptorchidectomy - inguinal / parainguinal: preferred by some surgeons because vaginal ring is not disrupted and the aponeurosis of the external abdominal oblique muscle is more easily sutured than the superficial inguinal ring.
- Flank Testis: cryptorchidectomy - flank.
- Suprapubic paramedian Testis: cryptorchidectomy - suprapubic paramedian - similar advantages to parainguinal approach.
Time required
Preparation
- General anesthesia induction and maintenance: 20 min.
- Aseptic preparation: 10-15 min.
Procedure
- 30-90 min.
Decision taking
Criteria for choosing test
- See Testis: cryptorchidism.
- The ventral midline approach (described here) allows maximum exposure for removal of enlarged testis, eg tumor Testis: neoplasia - overview, teratoma Teratoma, hydrocele/hematocele Testis: hematoma or testes at remote and unusual sites within the abdomen.
- Inguinal approach: allows removal of both abdominal/inguinal testicles or quick conversion to parainguinal approach.
- Parainguinal/inguinal Testis: cryptorchidectomy - inguinal / parainguinal approaches: smaller incision size, quicker and less convalescence.
- Suprapubic paramedian Testis: cryptorchidectomy - suprapubic paramedian/flank Testis: cryptorchidectomy - flank/ventral midline approaches: considered more invasive than inguinal/parainguinal and may → increased post-operative complications.
- Paramedian/flank approaches: allow removal of abdominal testicles only (not inguinally retained testes).
- Flank approach Testis: cryptorchidectomy - flank: can be conducted in standing animal.
- Laparoscopic removal Abdomen: laparoscopy of the testis is minimally invasive and can be conducted in the standing animal.
Risk assessment
- General anesthesia - dorsal recumbency Anesthesia: general - overview.
Requirements
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Preparation
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Technique
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Aftercare
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Outcomes
Subscribe To View
This article is available to subscribers.
Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.
Further Reading
Publications
Refereed papers
- Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
- Kilcoyne I & Spier S J (2021) Castration complications: a review of castration techniques and how to manage complications. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 37 (2), 259-273 PubMed.
- Owens C D, Hughes K J, Hilbert B J et al (2018) Survey of equine castration techniques, preferences and outcomes among Australian veterinarians. Aust Vet J 96 (1-2), 39-45 PubMed.
- Kilcoyne I (2013) Equine castration: a review of techniques, complications and their management Equine Vet Ed, 476-482 AAEP.
- Searle D, Dart A J, Dart C M & Hodgson D R (1999) Equine castration: review of anatomy, approaches, techniques and complications in normal, cryptorchid and monorchid horses. Aust Vet J 77 (7), 428-434 PubMed.
Other sources of information
- Russell T M & Pollock P J (2011) Cryptorchid Castration. In: Equine Reproduction. 2nd edn. Eds: McKinnon A O, Squire E L, Varner D D & Vaala W E. Blackwell Publishing Limited, USA. pp 1531-1539.
- Shumacher J (1992) Cryptorchid Castration. In: Equine Surgery. Ed: Auer J A. W B Saunders, USA.