Septic shock in Horses (Equis) | Vetlexicon
equis - Articles

Septic shock

ISSN 2398-2977


Introduction

  • Cause: any condition leading to sepsis or SIRS from a septic origin that has developed such that the patient is hypotensive.
  • Signs: tachycardia, tachypnea, cool extremities, delayed capillary refill time, purple to red mucous membranes that may have toxic line, decreased jugular filling, decreased pulse pressure, altered mentation.
  • Diagnosis: clinical signs associated with SIRS with confirmed or suspicion of a septic focus and hypotension. Positive or suspected positive blood culture alongside hypotension.
  • Treatment: fluid expansion, management of source of sepsis including antibiotic therapy, anti-SIRS therapy, anti-inflammatories, digital cryotherapy, positive inotropic and/or pressor support.
  • Prognosis: guarded.

Presenting signs

  • Presenting signs for septic shock include those for sepsis plus hypotension:
    • Increased heart rate.
    • Increased respiratory rate.
    • Decreased pulse pressure.
    • Decreased jugular refill.
    • Prolonged capillary refill time.
    • Purple to red mucous membranes.
    • Altered mentation.
    • Cool extremities (distal limbs, ears).
    • Hypotension.

Acute presentation

  • Patients presenting acutely in septic shock. Therefore, the presenting signs described in the previous section represent the acute presentation.
  • It is important to remember that the patient presenting in septic shock may display altered mentation that can range from depression or somnolence.
  • The original problem for many adult horses in septic shock is usually, but not always within the gastrointestinal system; thus, these patients may also present for signs of colic. The source can also be the chest in the case of pleuropneumonia or endocarditis. In foals, sepsis and septic shock is usually secondary to a failure of passive transfer and bacterial translocation through the gastrointestinal tract.

Public health considerations

  • Certain infectious bacterial organisms lead to the development of septic shock and data suggests that in both adult horses and foals it can be triggered by both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms.
  • Salmonella species Salmonella spp have been implicated in cases of septic shock. The likely prevalence is affected by geographic location, with this being highest in North America. Precautions should be undertaken if Salmonella is confirmed or suspected, when evaluating a patient with septic shock.

Cost considerations

  • Significant.
  • Due to the size of the adult horse and the severity of the disease process leading to septic shock, the cost to appropriately manage these conditions can be significant.
  • Survival, even with optimal care is only between 40-70%.

Special risks

  • Anesthesia and sedation, although sequelae are not as high in this group due to the complexities of the cardiac derangements
  • These patients are not perfusing their tissues adequately due to decreased blood volume, poor contractility, or hypotension. Therefore, any medications that affect vasomotor tone or blood pressure could further limit oxygen delivery and worsen the condition.
  • Restoring circulatory volume and pressure support if the patient is hypotensive are recommended prior to sedation or anesthesia when possible. However, many of these cases also have strangulating obstructions of the gastrointestinal tract that must be removed before resolution of septic shock can occur.
  • Safety of personnel as these horses can colic, collapse and die.

Pathogenesis

Etiology

Predisposing factors

General

Specific

  • Access to other horses with infectious agents (Salmonella Salmonella spp, Clostridium Clostridia spp, etc) known to cause gastrointestinal disease.
  • Idiopathic responses to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) resulting in right dorsal colitis Colon: colitis.
  • Chronic usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
  • Horses receiving antibiotics.
  • Retained placenta Placenta: retained.
  • Grain overload Stomach: rupture.

Pathophysiology

  • Systemic circulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) either in its shed form (unbound) or membrane bound form (still attached to gram-negative bacterial cell wall) MAY start the process. It is now accepted that several proteins on the surface of gram-positive organisms can trigger an identical response and is now known that is not all about LPS and endotoxin. This is one of the reasons why the name of this condition was changed over three decades ago.
  • In the case of gram-negative organisms, LPS binds to either lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), which in turn binds to CD14 (macrophage membrane bound endotoxin receptor) or directly to CD14 (skipping the step with LBP).
  • CD14 interacts with another membrane bound protein (MD2) to transfer a signal to Toll like receptor 4 (TLR-4).
  • TLR-4 is a transmembrane spanning receptor that transduces the signal to an intracellular signaling cascade which is comprised of a number of enzymatic steps of various kinases, culminating in the intra-nuclear activation of NF-KB.
  • Once the nucleus is activated transcription of proinflammation genes ensues. Representatives of these genes include TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, Platelet Activating Factor (PAF).
  • The genetic transcription of these proinflammatory cytokines/mediators leads to activation of:
    • The coagulation cascade leading to endotoxin-induced coagulopathies.
    • Systemic inflammation (SIRS) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome - prostaglandin and leukotriene mediated.
    • The complement pathway and macrophage lysis.
  • The cumulative effects of these pathways (most particularly systemic inflammation) are responsible for cardiovascular depression, pulmonary hypertension, and arterial hypoxemia.
  • These effects can then lead to decreased tissue perfusion and peripheral hypoxia.
  • Eventually perfusion to major organ systems can be compromised and lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death.
  • Gram-positive bacteria can also activate a similar cascade:
    • Bacterial components such as peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid activate the host defense by engaging pattern recognition receptors (such as NOD-1 and NOD-2) and toll-like receptors (particularly TLR-2) of the innate immune system.
    • TLR-2 is a transmembrane receptor similar to TLR-4 which initiates an intracellular enzymatic cascade that ends with NFkB translocation and subsequent gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines and mediators (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8).
    • Similar to the response seen with gram-negative bacteria, these mediators can lead to cardiovascular depression, pulmonary hypertension, arterial hypoxemia, decreased tissue perfusion, peripheral hypoxia, and ultimately, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death.

Timecourse

  • 2-6 h.

Epidemiology

  • Septic shock is typically secondary to a primary disease process within one patient. However, it can be associated with infectious disease, in which case epidemiologic considerations should be made per the specific infectious disease.

Diagnosis

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Treatment

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Prevention

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Outcomes

Subscribe To View

This article is available to subscribers.

Try a free trial today or contact us for more information.

Further Reading

Publications

Refereed Papers

  • Recent references from PubMed and VetMedResource.
  • Werners A H (2017) Treatment of endotoxaemia and septicaemia in the equine patient. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 40 (1), 1-15 PubMed.
  • Fogle J, Jacob M, Blikslager A et al (2017) Comparison of lipopolysaccharides and soluble CD14 measurement between clinically endotoxaemic and nonendotoxaemic horses. Equine Vet J 49 (2), 155-159 PubMed.
  • Moore J N & Vandenplas M L (2014) Is it the systemic inflammatory response syndrome or endotoxemia in horses with colic? Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 30 (2), 337-351 VetMedResource.
  • Jacobs C C, Holcombe S J, Cook V L et al (2013) Ethyl pyruvate diminishes the inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide infusion in horses. Equine Vet J 45 (3), 333-339 PubMed.
  • Tadros E M & Frank N (2012) Effects of continuous or intermittent lipopolysaccharide administration for 48 hours on the systemic inflammatory response in horses. Am J Vet Res 73 (9), 1394-1402 PubMed.
  • Forbes G, Church S, Savage C J & Bailey S R (2012) Effects of hyperimmune equine plasma on clinical and cellular responses in a low-dose endotoxaemia model in horses. Res Vet Sci 92 (1), 40-44 PubMed.
  • Senior J M, Proudman C J, Leuwer M & Carter S D (2011) Plasma endotoxin in horses presented to an equine referral hospital: correlation to selected clinical parameters and outcomes. Equine Vet J 43 (5), 585-591 PubMed.
  • Alcott C J, Sponseller B A, Wong D M et al (2011) Clinical and immunomodulating effects of ketamine in horses with experimental endotoxemia. J Vet Intern Med 25 (4), 934-943 PubMed.
  • Werners A H, Bull S & Fink-Gremmels J (2005) Endotoxaemia: a review with implications for the horse. Equine Vet J 37 (4), 371-383 PubMed.

Other sources of information

  • Rowe E (2008) Management of Horses with Gastrointestinal Disorders. In: The Equine Hospital Manual. Ed: Corley K & Stephen J. Wiley-Blackwell, UK. pp 499-519.
  • Marino P (2013) Marino’s the ICU Book. 4th edn. Ed: Marino P. Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, USA.